What Happens If You’re Charged With Fraud?
This post may contain affiliate links which might earn us money. Please read my Disclosure and Privacy policies here
According to the research conducted by the Pew Research Center, it turns out that 73% of adult Americans have experienced falling victim to credit card fraud, ransomware, online shopping swindles, or more, in one way or another.
This study shows how exposed the general population is to schemers who want to take people's money in illicit ways.
Each form of fraud comprises a wide range of activities, such as check kiting, health bill fraud, wire fraud, and securities fraud. In almost all cases of fraud, the accompanying accusations include the same definitions.
The prosecutor must show that the accused individual tried to mislead or suppress the facts to win something valuable.
The prosecution must also present proof that the victim believed and acted upon the false information, resulting in damages.
Since each of these components must be established by the prosecutor beyond a reasonable doubt, there is always a defense strategy that can challenge any of the state’s issues regarding intent, the alleged misrepresentation, or the harm sustained.
According to Naples white-collar crime lawyer Donald Day, a white-collar crime like fraud may seem less serious than violent crimes. But still, it is subjected to serious prosecution by the legal system.
Let’s take a look at the events that follow after receiving a fraud charge.
Federal vs. State Fraud Prosecution
Many fraud cases may proceed in state or federal courts. The question of jurisdiction will play an important part for the accused. For instance, federal crimes lead to very strict punitive measures.
The Federal Sentencing Guidelines help courts determine sentences in federal fraud cases. Although the guidelines are advisory, they often recommend longer sentences than those imposed in similar state cases.
Federal prosecutors also conduct thorough investigations before filing charges. As a result, federal fraud cases typically rely on extensive evidence gathered before an indictment is issued.
Common federal fraud charges include mail fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 1341 and wire fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 1343. Each offense carries a maximum penalty of 20 years in prison, with no mandatory minimum sentence. These laws apply to many schemes involving the mail or electronic communications.
Prosecutors may also add charges such as bank fraud, healthcare fraud, or securities fraud. Doing so increases the number of counts and can lead to harsher penalties.
If the fraud targets a financial institution or involves federally insured funds, the bank fraud statute raises the maximum prison sentence to 30 years.
State fraud charges cover the same overall conduct. In this case, however, the statutes are different for each state. Several thresholds indicate whether these cases are classified as misdemeanors or felonies.
Most states do not criminalize fraud resulting from losses less than $1,000 or $2,500. More severe criminal levels appear when losses exceed $10,000 or $50,000. State courts’ sentences for a range of crimes are usually less than for the same offenses in the federal judiciary.
In many areas, state attorneys have more flexibility in plea bargaining when handling this type of case.
How Federal Fraud Cases Develop Before Charges Are Filed
Federal fraud investigations often take months or even years to complete. Agencies such as the FBI, IRS Criminal Investigation, the Secret Service, and other federal authorities may spend significant time gathering evidence before making an arrest or filing charges.
By the time a federal grand jury issues an indictment, prosecutors often have extensive evidence. This may include bank records, email communications, witness statements, financial analyses, and, in some cases, years of recorded conversations.
The period before formal charges are filed is often critical. During this stage, prosecutors may begin plea discussions if they believe a person can assist with a larger investigation.
A grand jury subpoena or a target letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office may be the first sign of a federal fraud investigation. In some cases, federal agents may also visit a person's home or workplace. Seeking legal counsel as soon as possible can significantly affect how the case moves forward.
For more information on the preparation involved in fraud and other white-collar crimes, visit: https://www.atlantanotguilty.com/.
What Federal Fraud Charges Include: Forfeiture and Restitution
Federal fraud convictions have two other financial consequences beyond fines and prison that the draft never really spelled out. One is criminal forfeiture, which applies to property used in the fraud or obtained from it.
If the government proves that someone acquired assets through fraud, it can seize bank accounts, real estate, vehicles, and even business interests.
After a conviction, asset forfeiture may extend to nearly all property linked to the fraud. In large fraud cases, the value of forfeited assets can exceed the criminal fine by a significant margin.
Another major consequence is mandatory restitution. Under the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3663A, federal courts must order defendants to repay victims in full, regardless of their ability to pay.
Unlike many other debts, restitution cannot be discharged through bankruptcy. It also remains in effect after a prison sentence ends. As a result, a defendant may complete a prison term but still owe millions of dollars in restitution.
Post-judgment interest will also apply and runs at the federal rate until it’s paid. In practice, restitution obligations can end up trailing a defendant for decades.
The Federal Sentencing Guidelines and Fraud
There are guidelines in place to calculate federal charges for fraud. In most fraud cases, the minimum sentence is 0 to 6 months, which falls within an applicable adjusted offense level of 7.
This particular figure increases based on the size of the loss, the number of victims, the use of sophisticated means, the defendant's leadership role, and numerous other factors. Even the loss amount enhancement by itself can tack on 20 offense levels to a case.
It can be considered a real jump from a range you’d measure in months to a range you’d more or less measure in years, especially when the losses go beyond $25 million.
The federal fraud sentencing is heavily influenced by the calculated loss amount, which can be contested in numerous instances. During sentencing, the parties may argue over what is actually counted as “loss.”
The guideline may use terms like “intended loss” versus “actual loss.” They may look into how victim losses get lumped together across a multi-year scheme and whether the defendant is on the hook for the entire sweep of the plot or just their own individual conduct.
Those disputes can meaningfully change the advisory guideline range.
A defendant whose advisory range lands at 24 to 30 months is facing a pretty different sentencing result than someone looking at 97 to 121 months. There is obviously a gap that can come down to contested loss calculation methodology more than people expect.
Common Defenses in Fraud Cases
Intent is often one of the most contested elements in a fraud case. A person who honestly believed their statements were true or lacked the intent to deceive may avoid a fraud conviction, even if those statements later proved to be inaccurate.
A good-faith belief in the truth of a statement can provide a strong defense. For that reason, internal communications, business records, and legal advice received at the time of the conduct may help demonstrate good faith.
In addition, following legal advice can strengthen a defense. If the defendant fully disclosed all material facts to their attorney and acted on that advice while believing their actions were lawful, they may have a strong good-faith defense.
Another method that legal defense teams use is to present that there is insufficient evidence of intent. When trying to prove the presence of deceptive intent, the burden of proof lies on the prosecution.
When the evidence points to poor judgment, negligence, excessive optimism, or simple incompetence instead of intentional deception, the accused may not have intended to commit fraud.
As a result, intent becomes a key issue in many business-related fraud cases. Courts often distinguish between a failed business deal caused by overly optimistic statements and one involving knowingly false statements made to carry out a fraudulent scheme.
